Quick Fire interview with Scriptcat!

Mark Sanderson aka ScriptcatMark Dark: Scriptcat, great to have you here. Your blog posts are brilliant.

Scriptcat: You’re too kind!

Mark Dark: How do you choose what to write about?

Scriptcat: The only plan was to write about every aspect of screenwriting.

Mark Dark: Are you picky about what you post?

Scriptcat: I’m very picky.

Mark Dark: Do you have a set schedule for blogging?

Scriptcat: I’ve no set schedule.

Mark Dark: How long do you spend on Twitter?

Scriptcat: I’m on it daily and multiple times daily. It’s been a great way to share and connect.

Mark Dark:  How long did it take you to break into the industry?

Scriptcat: Seven years.

Mark Dark: When did you give up the day job?

Scriptcat: I’ve never really had a “day job” and really only once—and for two years, while I was going through UCLA Film School. I waited tables at night.

Mark Dark: So when did you get your big break?

Scriptcat: I never had one big break into the film industry, it’s been a series of little breaks.

Mark Dark:  Did you ever get a ‘proper’ job ?

Scriptcat: Once I took a job at a law firm but during this time I was hired to write a movie. That was the sign I needed. It was the universe telling me it was time to take the leap.

Mark Dark: Maybe some aspiring writers need a more ‘secure’ career as well.

Scriptcat: Dangerous.

Mark Dark: Why?

Scriptcat:   Aspiring writers become so busy with their lives and the lives of others, they see their dream of being a working screenwriter slowly slipping away.

Mark Dark: What about writing a little bit every day?

Scriptcat: You can peck away a few pages a day, but there’s nothing like writing full time with the hunger burning in your soul.  You’d be surprised how quickly a dream becomes a distant memory unless you stay in the game and live a writer’s life.

Mark Dark: Is image important?

Scriptcat: Hollywood is all about image, and the image you project is the one they will believe.

Mark Dark: You think it’s good to write specs?

Scriptcat: We always need our specs but it’s nice to actually get paid to write.

Mark Dark: Are you disciplined?

Scriptcat: It’s my middle name!

Mark Dark: How do we master it?

Scriptcat: I think my mastery of discipline came from my assignment work with producers and having to write on a deadline. It’s helped me to juggle the various writing I actually do.

Mark Dark: What are you juggling at the moment?

Scriptcat: The screenwriting is ongoing with various projects in various stages of development.

Mark Dark: How do you organize your time?

Scriptcat: Importance.

Mark Dark: What’s your view of the writing process?

Scriptcat: I am a huge believer in doing a detailed outline or better yet, a treatment.

Mark Dark: So you think we should plan?

Scriptcat: No architect of anything would ever just start building without detailed plans.  It’s foolish for writers to do the same.

Mark Dark: How soon should a writer pay for feedback ?

Scriptcat: I would suggest a writer get a few drafts completed and when they get to a point where they feel they can’t answer the important questions of, “does this story work?” or “does this suck?” — it’s time to hire a consultant.

Mark Dark: Could we send you a treatment for feedback?

Scriptcat: I’ve actually never consulted on someone’s treatment, usually it’s the finished script.

Mark Dark: Film is often called a visual medium but doesn’t dialogue play a huge role in story telling these days?

Scriptcat: I still believe movies are a visual medium first and foremost.  Here’s what David Mamet has to say about this subject:

A good film script should be able to do completely without dialogue.

Mark Dark: What about Tarantino? What would his films be like without dialogue?

Scriptcat: I understand and love the whole Tarantino style, but if you or I turned in a script with ten pages of dialogue at the beginning as in Inglorious Bastards, they’d toss it into the dumpster. He can get away with this because of who he is.

Mark Dark: What about Woody Allen?

Scriptcat: Woody Allen is a huge influence on me but I’d never try and turn in a screenplay with his amount of dialogue.

Mark Dark: But don’t some screenplay’s rely heavily on dialogue?

Scriptcat: It takes a master.

Mark Dark: What are your favorite films ?

Scriptcat: I basically love movies—period.

Mark Dark: What are the most common problems with scripts you analyze?

Scriptcat: A serious lack of knowledge about screenplay format.  So many scripts are overwritten. The fewer words the better. Also understanding that screenwriting is rewriting.  Many believe their first draft is perfect and they’ll fall out of bed the next morning and stumble ass backwards into a three-picture studio deal.  Reality check ahead!

Mark Dark: How can we iron out the mistakes before they get to you?

Scriptcat: Learn the craft. Also become a voracious screenplay reader.  So many scripts are available online now, there’s no excuse.

Mark Dark: Is correct formatting important?

Scriptcat: If a screenwriter doesn’t care enough to even know basics of proper format the producer or executive will think: “Why should I waste my precious time on this garbage when the writer didn’t even take the time to get it right?”

Mark Dark: Thanks for taking the time to talk to do this interview, Scriptcat. I know you’re busy!

Seven times produced screenwriter Mark Sanderson (@scriptcat) is a veteran of the filmmaking game with over fifteen years of professional experience and has worked with Academy Award® winning producers, veteran directors, and Academy Award® and Golden Globe® acting nominees. Mark’s indie and TV films have been distributed around the world and have opened and premiered at major festivals. His popular screenwriting blog MY BLANK PAGE was Script Magazine’s pick for website of the week and has over 100,000 readers.

 

 

 

Interview with Scriptcat!

Mark Dark: Scriptcat, great to have you here. Thanks for taking the time to talk to us. Your blog posts are brilliant, very inspirational and educational.

Scriptcat: Ah, you are too kind!  It’s really nice to hear my articles can inspire and maybe teach a bit of wisdom.  It makes it all worth it.

Mark Dark: It can be time consuming to blog, especially the detail and quality of your posts. How much time do you dedicate and how do you choose what to write about?

Scriptcat: A year ago I decided to set up the blog and start writing articles every week.  The only plan was to write about every aspect of screenwriting—from the art and craft, living a writer’s life, carving out a career, and the business side of screenwriting.  I recalled the years of crazy meetings and my adventures with development and production.  I really wanted to get those experiences down somewhere to share.

Mark Dark: I love reading them. You cover some fascinating subjects. Are you picky about what you post?

Scriptcat: I’m very picky about what I post, so it can take me longer to decide if an idea for an article is good enough to share.  I don’t want to start posting articles I feel are sub-standard to what I’ve written before.  I continually raise the bar on myself and I think it keeps the articles at certain level of integrity.  Now after 89 articles, I’ve slowed down a bit, but as I’ve gained new followers who may not dig deep into the site, I’ve re-posted some of the early articles to draw attention. Then just when I think I’m written out suddenly I lock into a new topic and find myself writing four monster articles in a week—and they were some of my best ever.

Mark Dark: Do you have a set schedule for blogging?

Scriptcat: I have no set schedule but something always comes up in my adventures that becomes a great topic to share.  The fact I just hit 17,000 all-time views this week motivates me to continue.

Mark Dark: Wow that’s awesome. Oh, and, how long do you spend on Twitter?

Scriptcat: Twitter?  I’m on it daily, and multiple times daily, as it’s been a great way to share and connect.  Example being this interview, connecting with you, and getting to read your terrific short fiction “Man or Mouse.”  That was my shameless plug, not his!

Mark Dark: Haha! Thanks dude! But back to you! You’re a full time working screenwriter and script consultant. How long did it take you to break into the industry?

Scriptcat: That day happened seven years out of college.  There were a few small gigs here and there, but when it came it was like being in a dream.  I was hired to be a staff writer on a hugely successful cable network game show, but six weeks later I was fired!  I hung on and three months later my spec screenplay (my fifth spec at the time) was optioned and a year later went into production.

Mark Dark: So when did you give up the day job?

Scriptcat: I’ve never really had a “day job” and really only once—and for two years, while I was going through UCLA Film School. I waited tables at night and did that for years after I graduated. It meant having the time to take meetings, pitch and everything that goes into getting out there.

I was able to write and perform in a sketch comedy show once a month for nearly four years, shoot a pilot, and have a number one parody song on nationwide comedy radio.  I’m sure much of that would not have ever happened if I worked a 9-5 job and could only do my own thing at night or the weekends.

Mark Dark: Wow, sounds like you’ve done a lot of different things! Is that good for a writer?

Scriptcat: I’ve had so many odd jobs over the years. I believe that’s a great place for a writer’s observations and just to have real-world experiences of survival.

Mark Dark: So when did you get your big break?

Scriptcat: I never had one big break into the film industry, it’s been a series of little breaks, steady breaks that were not always in quick succession—like if you were swinging from a vine and the next vine didn’t come as quickly as you expected.  I may have been out there swinging freely, but I always kept swinging and moving forward, and most importantly doing the work—even when I was beaten down and there seemed to be no hope.

Mark Dark: If writers need to take a day job, for security, isn’t that OK?

Scriptcat: These are the dangerous times for screenwriters when many give up their dream and take that secure day job, or it’s when their significant other tells them “you can always write on the weekends” as my ex-girlfriend did with me.  Aspiring writers become so busy with their lives and the lives of others, they see their dream of being a working screenwriter slowly slipping away.

Mark Dark: What about writing a little bit every day?

Scriptcat: You can peck away a few pages a day, but there’s nothing like writing full time with the hunger burning in your soul.  You’d be surprised how quickly a dream becomes a distant memory unless you stay in the game and live a writer’s life.

Mark Dark: Do you think getting a job in production is a good idea for a writer?

Scriptcat: I always believe Hollywood is all about image, and the image you project is the one they will believe.  I decided to work a job that paid good money but more importantly had flexible hours.  This allowed me to focus on writing and becoming a better screenwriter.

If I was working 12 hours a day on a TV show or movie as an assistant, I didn’t see how that would help my screenwriting.  I already knew the nuts and bolts of film-making, I had been making films since I was 12 years old with friends, and my focus was becoming the best screenwriting I could be.  That takes precious time.  I made a pact with myself, I would not go from a waiter to being a restaurant manager or something, and it had to be a vertical move into the film business.

Mark Dark: Waiting tables is tough. I’ve done it myself. Did you ever feel like giving in and getting a ‘proper’ job ?

Scriptcat: During one period, my business really slowed down and I gave in and took a job at a law firm, as my buddy was partner there and I was immediately hired, but it was a 9-5 grind and I’d come home and write all night until bed, get up, do my job at the firm, come home and write, and write on weekends.  I had a girlfriend at the time, so I slowly found my precious writing time, my focus and discipline starting to wane.

I was making great money, but got soft, as I wasn’t as hungry for it. Suddenly, two years went past in a blink.  Now, I have to add, during this time I was hired to write a movie and I was able to get that done, and something I had written went into production (and I had to get the time off to visit the set), but I started to hate living two lives.  I was thankful for the opportunity, but by the end of the two years, I started to take longer lunches and dread going to work. The routine of two jobs was killing me.

Mark Dark: So what did you do?

Scriptcat: I finally quit when I received a call from the head of a production company I had worked with before and they had a new script for me to write. That was the sign I needed. It was the universe telling me it was time to take the leap and trust everything would be okay.  This was my chance to get back into the writer’s life with no looking back.  Money wasn’t my driving force, as I’ve never lived above my means and that’s so important, otherwise you can become a slave to a job because you can never quit.

My fourth spec screenplay made some noise and got meetings and all of that, but it was a huge action film and we were unknowns and eventually hit a wall.  My fifth spec was the magic number script and it went on to be produced and to date was my only spec that has sold.  That was a long seven-year journey from first draft to first day of production.   All of my other work has been screenplay assignment jobs, and I’m totally okay with that.  Assignment jobs are the bread and butter of working screenwriters.

Mark Dark: So, is it good to write specs?

Scriptcat: We always need our specs, but it’s nice to actually get paid to write and have it end up being produced and distributed.  My assignment jobs mostly have an output deal already in place with a network and foreign sales, so it’s nice to know if it’s made, it will end up being seen by a global audience.  I’ve written twenty-six screenplays to date, eleven have been assignments, six have been produced into films and distributed, and five projects are in development.  It’s been a long journey!

Mark Dark: From your posts you seem like a pretty meticulous organizer. Is that right? How do you organize your time between screenwriting, consulting and blogging? Do you keep to a specific schedule? Are you disciplined?

Scriptcat: Discipline?  It’s my middle name!  It’s one of the primary attributes a writer needs to master to find any type of success in this business.  I’ve always been disciplined and it was never hard for me to keep focus on my ultimate goals.  It’s like Bruce Lee said in Enter the Dragon:

“It is like a finger pointing a way to the moon. Don’t concentrate on the finger or you will miss all that heavenly glory.”

I always focus on the project at hand, but I’m very aware of how it fits into the bigger picture of my career.

Mark Dark: Discipline’s tough. How can we master it?

Scriptcat: I think my mastery of discipline came from my assignment work with producers and having to write on a deadline and know I’m contracted to turn in material under strict deadlines.  It’s helped me to juggle the various writing I actually do.

Mark Dark: What are you juggling at the moment?

Scriptcat: The screenwriting is ongoing with various projects in various stages of development.  I just completed the final pass of my TV pilot with my manager and we’re preparing for early reads before the next pilot cycle before summer.

I’ve been working with a director on pitches for a network, doing a polish of another script I co-wrote with another director that’s going out to investors, and developing a new pitch for an actress that she may develop.  There’s always something going on with as many plates spinning as possible.  It takes tremendous discipline and I always hear excuses from people of why they can’t do it—just do it.

Mark Dark: So how do you organize your time?

Scriptcat: Firstly, I organize it by the importance—the contracted screenwriting jobs come first in the pipeline as they pay the rent and put food in the icebox.  Unless you work as a staff writer on a TV series and have a steady job, the indy screenwriter’s life is much like that of a gypsy—going from job to job and looking for your next gig.  The reality is there are down times and it gets slow, so it’s nice during those times to have the consulting service and the blog—and now my new workshop.

The blog has been a great place for me to share my years of zany adventures in the screen trade and to offer real-world advice that might help others avoid many of the pitfalls on their journey.

Mark Dark: What’s your view of the development process?

Scriptcat: I am a huge believer in doing a detailed outline or better yet, a treatment, before you dive into writing the script. After being hired for eleven script assignments, it’s just a natural process for me and no producer I work for would ever let me start a script without a solid, detailed treatment or step outline.

I believe writers should start getting into the habit of crafting a treatment/step outline or beat sheet before they start the script, as they’ll need that experience if they ever want to get an assignment job.  I hear writers say, “I have this idea and I just want to start writing and see where it takes me.”  That’s a recipe for disaster and definite way to get stuck in that barren wasteland called “ACT 2.”

Mark Dark: So, you think we shouldn’t just write something without planning?

Scriptcat: No architect of anything would ever just start building without detailed plans.  It’s foolish for writers to do the same and it shows a lack of respect for the craft of screenwriting.  I try to instill in aspiring writers a treatment/step outline or beat sheet is their friend, not the enemy of improvisation.  Writers have plenty of breathing room within the actual scenes to come up with brilliant stuff as they plot along toward “FADE OUT—THE END” but using a road map.

Mark Dark: How soon should a writer get involved and pay for feedback from a pro like yourself?

Scriptcat: I would suggest a writer get a few drafts completed and when they get to a point where they feel they can’t answer the important questions of, “does this story work?” or “does this suck?” — it’s time to hire a consultant.  I find some consultants make promises to know what the studios are buying and other lofty hooks, but in reality “nobody knows anything” as William Goldman so eloquently stated.

Mark Dark: Well if nobody knows anything is consultancy useful then or not?

Scriptcat: Hiring a good consultant can really help with a completely objective opinion, rather than having friends or your mother read the script.  It’s also a safe place to expose the flaws of your script and not suffer the wrath of horrible coverage that gets logged into some Hollywood database. There’s no going back when this coverage is in the system and you are fu*ked as everyone knows your script is a stinker.

Mark Dark: Could we send you a treatment for feedback? Tell us if the story will sell or not?

Scriptcat: I’ve actually never consulted on someone’s treatment, usually it’s the finished script they come to me with and want analysis, editing and notes.  I believe it’s not my place to crush anyone’s dream and say their idea will never sell.  Who knows?  I can’t see into the future.  Even my own ideas may not sell.  Many have not sold.  As a consultant, it’s my place to analyze if the writer was effective in what they tried to do.  If not — I give constructive feedback on how to fix it and other creative insights that can bring it to the next level.

Mark Dark: Film is often called a visual medium, and we are told to write visually. But, although starting visually as silent ‘moving pictures’, haven’t films become audio + visual? Doesn’t dialogue play a huge role in story telling these days?

Scriptcat: I still believe movies are a visual medium first and foremost.  You can tell more by one single image than any line of dialogue.  The marriage of both visual images and dialogue are important, but many times a film with too many talking heads starts to feel for me like a stage play. Here’s what playwright/screenwriter David Mamet has to say about this subject:

“A good film script should be able to do completely without dialogue.”

Mark Dark: OK, so what about Tarantino? What would his films be like without dialogue?

Scriptcat: I understand and love the whole Tarantino style, but if you or I turned in a script with ten pages of dialogue at the beginning as in Inglorious Bastards, they’d toss it into the dumpster. He can get away with this because of who he is as a filmmaker.  I had a friend ask me once to borrow my copy of Pulp Fiction because he wanted to “study how scripts were written.”  I told him to forget it, that ship sailed with Tarantino and his imprint and voice on cinema is locked.  I told my friend to find his own voice.

Mark Dark: What about Woody Allen?

Scriptcat: Woody Allen is a huge influence on me, but I’d never try and turn in a screenplay with his amount of dialogue.  Again, the scripts they write will always be produced, as they are writer/directors.  I see this in my consulting work, beginning writers being influenced and trying to emulate a known filmmaker’s style and failing miserably.  The scripts are overwritten and every character has loads of dialogue and the scenes go on way too long.  Again, it takes years of writing to master this technique and not have it come off as huge amounts of exposition. As Norma Desmond said in one of my favorite films, Sunset Boulevard:

“There once was a time in this business when I had the eyes of the whole world! But that wasn’t good enough for them, oh no! They had to have the ears of the whole world too. So they opened their big mouths and out came talk. Talk!  Talk!”

Mark Dark: But some screenplay’s rely heavily on dialogue, right?

Scriptcat: It takes a master to rely heavily on dialogue in a screenplay. I would not tell an aspiring screenwriter to try and emulate either one of the masters you’ve mentioned. Us mere mortals should stick to our own style until we have mastered screenwriting.

Mark Dark: What are your favorite films ? Do you have a favorite genre?

Scriptcat: I basically love movies—period.  I’ve been trying to watch a movie a night for the past year and catch up on ones I’ve missed and continue my ongoing studies.  I’m still a wide-eyed kid when the lights come down in the theater and I hope to be taken on a magical adventure.  When I was twelve-years-old and started making films with friends, I was hugely influenced by Spielberg and Lucas—Star Wars, Raiders of the Lost Ark, ET and Close Encounters were seminal films that inspired us to make movies.

Mark Dark: You said you used to be a comedy performer. Do you have comic influences in film?

Scriptcat: Some of my comedic influences come from writer/directors Woody Allen, Jerry Lewis, Frank Tashlin, Billy Wilder, Ernst Lubitch, Frank Capra, Howard Hawks, Preston Sturges, and Mel Brooks.  Woody’s Annie Hall and Broadway Danny Rose, everything by Jerry Lewis, Wilder’s Sunset Boulevard and The Apartment, Lubitch’s To Be or Not to Be and Ninotchka, Sturges’ classic Sullivan’s Travels, The Lady Eve and The Palm Beach Story, and Brooks’ Young Frankenstein and High Anxiety.  These are just a small list of some of my all time favorites.

Mark Dark: Are you a fan of Film Noir?

Scriptcat: I’ve been enjoying Noir for years since we studied the genre in film school and also the French New Wave. The style, characters and hard-boiled worlds appeal to me and they’ve become one of my favorite genres.  Some of my favorite directors are the great Orson Welles, John Huston, Jules Dassin, Alfred Hitchcock, Anthony Mann, and Jean-Luc Godard.  I’ve also enjoyed the many low-budget noirs from RKO when Howard Hughes owned the studio.  I love discovering films I’ve never seen and they turn out to be a gem.

Mark Dark: What about the heist genre? Which are your favorite films there?

Scriptcat: I love the heist genre. The great Rififi, The Italian Job, Seven Thieves, Topkopi, The League of Gentlemen, The Getaway, and even the WWII heist film Kelley’s Heroes are some favorites.

Mark Dark: What about action movies and war films?

Scriptcat: I love good WWII action movies of the 60s like The Guns of Navarone, The Great Escape, The Train, The Dirty Dozen and Where Eagles Dare.

Mark Dark: What about westerns?

Scriptcat: I went on a Western genre tear recently and have a new appreciation for the genre.  Great directors like John Ford, Howard Hawks, Henry Hathaway, and films like Rio Bravo, The Searchers, The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance, Red River, and The Wild Bunch.

Mark Dark: Are you a horror film fan?

Scriptcat: I don’t gravitate toward the slasher/horror genre or thrillers, but I do enjoy classic horror of the 30s/40s like The Black Cat and The Bride of Frankenstein and also the Hammer horror films of the 60s and early 70s, and I’ve recently discovered the work of Italian horror director Mario Bava and his Black Sunday and Twitch of the Death Nerve.

I also enjoy studying movies of a particular genre when I’m hired to write a genre screenplay.  When I tell friends I’m busy working and have to watch a stack of movies for research, they think it’s not work.  It’s all part of the process.  I had to research submarine action films when I was hired to write a submarine naval drama and used many films as influences including Run Silent, Run Deep, The Enemy Below, Crimson Tide, U-571, Das Boot, The Hunt for Red October, and K-19 The Widowmaker.

Mark Dark: In your script consultancy service what do you notice are the most common problems with scripts you analyze?

Scriptcat: I find many aspiring writers have a serious lack of knowledge about screenplay format.  So many scripts are overwritten.  Many new screenwriters feel the need to micromanage every scene and will even explain the color of the wallpaper.  I kid, but it’s not a joke, I’ve read detailed descriptions that belong in novels.  Producers and executives hate to read—funny in a business where the script is so important, but they like to see a lot of “white” on the page.

Mark Dark: What does that mean?

Scriptcat: This means the fewer words the better and it’s the job of the screenwriter to stay the hell out of the way of the story.  One script I read literally had exclamation points on every other line of dialogue.  The bar is very high in dialogue to use an exclamation point.  The death of your screenplay can be from 1,000 little format issues.  It’s all about the attention to the little details.  I can start reading a script and by the second page know it’s from an amateur. The producers and executives will notice too.

I also find a lack of respect for the treatment/step outline/beat sheet and how it related to the screenplay structure.  This arrogance will get a writer into trouble when they end up with a hundred and fifty-page script and have no idea where to cut.

Also, the understanding and acceptance that screenwriting is rewriting.  Many believe their first draft is perfect and they’ll fall out of bed the next morning and stumble ass backwards into a three-picture studio deal.  Reality check ahead!  After I read someone’s magnum opus and they tell me it took six months to write it without a treatment or even a step outline, I grimace and realized they just don’t understand.  A reader or producer will STOP reading after the first five pages.

Mark Dark: How can we iron out the mistakes before they get to you?

Scriptcat: LEARN THE CRAFT OF SCREENWRITING.  There are about twenty good books out there on the craft of screenwriting.  Every town has screenwriting lectures, classes or workshops.  Also become a voracious screenplay reader.  So many scripts are available online now, there really is no excuse, but being lazy or arrogant—that is a blatant disregard for the craft.

Mark Dark: Is correct formatting important? Surely that doesn’t matter, it’s just an editing thing. The story is still there.

Scriptcat: If a screenwriter doesn’t care enough to even know basics of proper format, the producer or executive (most likely their reader or assistant) will think, “Why should I waste my precious time on this garbage when the writer didn’t even take the time to get it right?  Obviously an amateur.”  It’s what separates the aspiring amateur from the professional.  If you always act as a professional in all matters of your screenwriting career, you’ll do just fine and you’ll be prepared for the day when you really do get your professional chance up to the plate.  You won’t have wasted your opportunity by not being ready.  Always go above and beyond to make it good.

Mark Dark: Brilliant interview, Scriptcat. Thanks!

Mark Sanderson (aka Scriptcat) is a veteran of the screenwriting game with over fifteen years of experience and blessed to be living his childhood dream of being a filmmaker. From his start in sketch comedy writing and performing live with The Amazing Onionheads and writing for MTV, to his eleven writing assignments that have garnered six produced films—the emotionally compelling I’ll Remember April, An Accidental Christmas, and Deck the Halls, the stylish indie noir Stingers, and action-packed thrillers USS Poseidon: Phantom Below and Silent Venom—Mark’s films have premiered on television networks Lifetime, Syfy, Fox Family, and HereTV and have received worldwide distribution.

His long association with Hollywood veterans and award-winning filmmakers dates back to his first produced screenplay, and has since worked with Producer’s Guild of America nominees, legendary genre directors, and Academy Award, Emmy and Golden Globe acting nominees.  Mark’s films have also been recognized around the world and have opened and premiered at major festivals.

His popular screenwriting blog MY BLANK PAGE  has developed into an Internet sensation with over 15,000 readers.  Check it out for a wealth of industry insight, wisdom and knowledge.

www.fiveoclockblue.net

Writers – are you listening?

The most important thing an actor learns is to listen. This is the key to great acting. This is the art of acting.

Why?

Because to listen is to be in ‘the moment’ – to be spontaneous. To react as it’s happening. No two takes by any actor worth her salt will be the same. If it is it won’t be in the moment. Which is to say… it won’t be organic.

Organic.

Key word.

So, because actors listen, does that mean characters should?

Well, do you always listen? And I’m not just talking about to the words being said to you, but do you listen between the lines? As @scriptcat says: sometimes we say more by not speaking.

So, are you listening to what’s not being said?

And characters may listen but it doesn’t mean that they always answer. Sometimes characters are so focused on their own goals that they fail to listen to what anyone else wants or needs.

Look at Aron in 127 Hours. If he’d have listened he’d have returned his mum’s calls, told her where he was going and would have escaped his suffering.

Writers – are you listening?

Are your characters?

Character Arc

In 127 Hours, immediately after the midpoint, we’re treated to Aron’s video camera antics and the hilarious spoof radio show self-examination. This is a superb blend of comedy and tragedy. Aron reveals the fact he’s always seen himself as a ‘big fucking hard American superhero’ who can do everything ‘on his own’.

This segment is writing of the highest quality. The hero has a moral and a psychological revelation. John Truby describes a psychological revelation as being a self-realization that affects the hero directly, that is, causes him to see how he is destroying himself.

A moral revelation in Truby terms is our hero’s realization that his actions are hurting the world around him: loved ones, friends, society.

Most heroes will have one revelation but in great movies like 127 Hours the hero will have both. Not only does Aron stop blaming his mother and take responsibility for his own actions, admitting he has been living his life with ‘supreme selfishness’ but he tells his parents directly into the camera how he wishes he’d told them how much he appreciates them.

Not only do we see Aron scream for help from strangers in the resolution of the movie illustrating Aron’s character arc, but Danny Boyle points us back to this theme of family love and connectedness with a little insert during the closing credits:

“Now Aron always leaves a note to say where he’s going.”

This pays off the opening dialogue where his sister leaves a message on the answerphone asking him to call his mom back as ‘she worries’.

So Aron’s moral revelation is realized: he has changed the world around him, outside of himself. Due to his harrowing ordeal he has lost his selfishness and now thinks of others ahead of himself.

But the genius of Danny Boyle’s and Simon Beaufoy’s script here is how Aron’s revelation – that his ‘supreme selfishness’ led him to this place of extreme suffering – is delivered with a ‘spoon full of sugar’ gift-wrapped in scathingly funny self-deprecating dialogue.

So what actually should be a tragic moment has us weeping with laughter. But then, as we’re pulled back to the seriousness of the situation, we’re crying again, our tears of laughter mingling nervously with tears of pain.

Perfect writing.

Recommended reading: Anatomy of Story by John Truby

Writing Resilient Characters

Reading the Industrial Scripts newsletter this week (which is brilliant – you should definitely sign up) there was a link to an article by Lyndsay Doran in the New York Times (read it here) where she had researched the emotional components of successful movies and the qualities audiences most value in a character. One such quality was ‘accomplishment’, but not how we might think:

“The accomplishment the audience values most is not when the heroine saves the day or the hero defeats his opponent. Instead the accomplishment the audience values most is resilience.”

This set me thinking about the hero I’m working with in my feature script. I realized that his problem is he doesn’t know who his enemy is until the end of Act 2.

However, in Training Day and The Recruit the enemy is also revealed late in the story, although having been there all along. This is what John Truby in his Anatomy of Story calls the fake-ally opponent

‘…the fake-ally opponent is one of the most complex and fascinating characters in a story because he is usually torn by a dilemma.’

But the problem still remains: if our heroes don’t know who their enemies are how do they fight against them and show that all important empathy-inducing resilience?

Take 127 Hours (screenplay by Danny Boyle and Simon Beaufoy). Here is a hero who shows incredible resilience in the harrowing few minutes of the Climax. The story up to this point is the character figuring out how to battle and overcome his enemy whilst analyzing how he managed to get in such a terrible predicament. Gradually, after attempting to blame his mother, his moral revelation comes and he blames himself (character arc). But all the way from the Act 1 Turning Point until the Climax this hero knows his enemy – the rock.

So, back to my story, how does my character show resilience throughout if he doesn’t know who his enemy is until the end of Act 2 ? For this we have to come back to Truby and his theories on threefold opposition. Truby teaches our heroes should be facing opposition from all three corners of the ring (with our hero in the other corner). So, even if the main antagonist is hidden there are two more antagonistic forces in play.

Take the 2005 movie North Country (screenplay by Michael Seitzman) where the female protagonist is fighting against sexual harassment in the work place. Opposition is flying at her from all angles. First and foremost from her male co-workers; secondly from the patriarchal management system; then from her Father (also one of her co-workers) and lastly (perhaps most surprisingly) from her female workmates. The resilience she shows is immense.

How resilient is your hero?

5 things to include in your opening dialogue.

The opening lines in 127 Hours (screenplay by Danny Boyle and Simon Beaufoy) are an answerphone message from Aron’s sister:

“Hey, Sonia here…again… I know you’re probably gonna be away this weekend, but listen… just think about what we’re gonna play, ‘cause we have to decide if we need to practice, it will be fun, anyway…oh…and, please call Mom, ‘cause, you know, she worries…”

These lines refer to 5 things:

1. Character Arc.

Why doesn’t Aron answer the phone? We see he’s super-busy preparing his trip, grabbing the bits and pieces he needs. And we all know how annoying phone calls are when we’re trying to get stuff done. But this preoccupation with himself shows us he is more focused on his own needs than his sister’s. The fact that Sonia emphasizes again tells us this isn’t the first time she’s called. And so Aron’s character flaw is illuminated – the flaw that will not only cause his extreme suffering but will also cause him to grow and change.

2. Foreshadowing.

‘Think about what we’re gonna play’ foreshadows a line of dialogue at the Act 2 Turning Point paid off when Aron apologizes to his sister for not being able to play the piano at her wedding. This apology tells us something way deeper and more important: that he has lost the battle. He is defeated. Michael Hague calls this the All is Lost moment. Blake Synder the Visit to Death.

3. Theme.

Sonia reminds Aron to call Mom as ‘she worries’. Later Aron realizes that if he hadn’t have been so selfish, if he had returned his mom’s calls, he would’ve told her where he was going and he would’ve been rescued. Major theme: interconnectedness + familial love.

So these opening lines not only foreshadow the Act 2 Turning Point before Aron’s do or die drive to survive, but they immediately point us to both theme and character arc.

SPOILER alert – please watch the movie before reading the rest of this post.

4. Endearing us to the Hero.

One of my favorite lines of dialogue comes where Aron meets the two lost female hikers. Aron rocks down the hill, superhero to the rescue, to help them with their map-reading. Realizing his mask is high on his face and he must look pretty scary, Aron jokes something about looking like Jason from Friday the 13th. Not only is this funny, and, as Michael Hague tells us in Screenwriting for Hollywood, funny always endears us to a hero, but it’s oozing subtext. Which brings us to –

5. Subtext.

Aron’s lines hiding a much deeper and far more sinister meaning. Check out his line:

Sorry about the Friday 13th thing. I’m only a psychopath on weekdays.

We don’t read much into it on first viewing. But actually it’s preparing us for – or foreshadows – the sudden Act 3 genre twist from family adventure drama to slasher/horror.

‘I’m not usually a psychopath,’ he’s saying (my paraphrase) ‘but stick around and later you can watch me hack my own arm off, Saw style.’

Are your opening lines of dialogue:

1. Pointing us to character arc?

2. Foreshadowing the climax?

3. Reflecting the theme?

4. Endearing us to your hero?

5. Harboring hidden meaning?

How deep is your dialogue?

3 Act Structure in 127 Hours

127 Hours runs at 90 minutes and adheres to perfect 3 Act Structure:

Act  1: 15 minutes.

Act 2a : 30 minutes. 

Midpoint

Act 2b: 30 minutes.

Act 3: 15 minutes

NB: The Midpoint or Point of No Return happens at 45 minutes – exactly half way through the movie.

Each act break + plot point is not only marked with a Turning Point  but is also marked with the end of a musical sequence.

Watch the film carefully paying attention to what happens at these exact times.

So, what happens at each Turning Point?

SPOILER ALERTwatch the movie before you read this analysis!

Act  1 begins by foreshadowing the moral revelation the hero will have in the climax – Aron’s selfishness – as he refuses to answer his mum’s phone calls or tell his work mate where he’s going. Next we’re shown an excited young man off on an adventure. He’s a daredevil. When he spectacularly falls from his mountain bike he simply smiles, snaps a pic of himself and he’s ‘back on the saddle’ foreshadowing his tenacity and resilience displayed in extremis in the Climax.

After exactly 15 minutes, Aron falls: the film’s inciting incident. He’s trapped by the rock. Danny Boyle inserts the film’s title 127 Hours here, telling us the movie, the real story, starts now. Like any Act 2 this is the new world, the upset Status quo which must be re-balanced.

So Act 2 begins at 15 minutes.

Then, 15 minutes into Act 2 (30 minutes into the movie) we have Plot Point 1 which points us towards the film’s major Theme.

So what happens here? Well, we see Aron as a small boy sitting on the Grand Canyon in his father’s loving embrace as they both stare out at the rising sun. (Theme: interconnectedness + familial love).

Between 30 minutes and the midpoint at 45 minutes we witness Aron beginning to make his video diary. He addresses his mom and dad – we hear his mother’s voice saying ‘call me – lots of love’  (Theme reinstated: connectedness + familial love).

The Midpoint or Point of No Return comes at exactly 45 minutes: Aron takes his pocket knife and tries to cut his arm – foreshadowing the Climax. Why is this the Point of No Return? Because Aron is considering another option, if all else fails.

And we’re into the second part of Act 2 which we’ll call Act 2b.

Immediately after the Midpoint we’re back with the video camera and treated to the hilarious spoof radio show and Aron’s self-examination. This is a superb blend of comedy and tragedy. He reveals the fact he’s always seen himself as a ‘big fucking hard American superhero’ who can do everything ‘on his own’. This is writing of the highest quality; the hero’s moral / psychological revelation that his ‘supreme selfishness’ – his character flaw – has led him to this place of captivity and isolation, later to become a place of extreme suffering, is delivered with a ‘spoon full of sugar’ as this self-revelation is presented to us by the writers gift-wrapped in brilliant dialogue as Aron attacks his own flaws with  scathingly funny self-deprecating humor.

Then, 15 minutes after the Midpoint at Plot Point 2 Aron rams the blade into his arm. Danny Boyle takes us visually inside his arm and we see the blade ‘close to the bone.’ An idiom often used when remarks cut close to the truth. And the truth Aron has just revealed to us? He has been living life selfishly. In fact, he apologizes to his mom and dad into the camera for being ‘unappreciative.’

After another 15 minutes, at around the 75th minute of the movie – leading towards the End of Act 2 Turning Point Aron apologizes to his sister that he won’t be able to play piano at her wedding. Another apology. This dialogue tells us he has accepted his fate and that fate is death. Michael Hague calls this the ‘All is Lost’ moment. Blake Snyder the ‘Visit to Death’.

Then, still at the 75th minute mark, we enter ACT 3 as Aron makes one last ‘do or die’ drive to set himself free, and, as a mirror to the Midpoint – BANG! – he rams the blade back into his arm and drags us, screaming and terrified, feeling every nerve of his tortuous pain, into the bloody, horrific Climax.

The next 15 minutes are the Resolution as Aron is rescued. Here Aron’s learning curve – his character arc – is clear as the ‘big hard fucking superhero’ who can do ‘everything on his own’ screams for help from strangers – a changed man.

127 Hours sticks to perfect 3 Act Structure as taught by Michael Hague and also adheres to John Truby’s teachings on Moral and Psychological Revelations in his book Anatomy of Story.

click for trailer

127 Hours – motifs

Part of the genius of 127 Hours (screenplay by Danny Boyle + Simon Beaufoy) are the recurring motifs which illuminate the major theme – that every living thing on earth is dependent on each other. We cannot survive without each other. But how do the writers portray this theme visually?

Two major motifs are Light and Water. Watch the movie again and see how prominent these are and how the writers and director uses them. And what are Light and Water ? Sources of Life itself. We can’t survive without either. Our very planet would die and so would we.

Another motif the writers use with subtle but powerful effect are how other creatures we share the earth with (symbolized by birds and insects) are also interdependent: the raven which flies overhead each day; the ants crawling on Aron’s skin. Birds feed on insects. Aron jokes in a seemingly irrelevant line of dialogue that almost escapes us:

‘I’ve peed twice but no number 2’s – which must disappoint my insect friends.’

But far from a throw-away line this is actually a profound statement about how we living creatures depend on each other – feed on each other. Literally.

A third motif used in this multi-layered movie is familial love, especially between child + parent. The memory of his father’s hug juxtaposed with the repeated use of his mother’s voice on the answer phone asking him to call her back, to connect.

We are all connected. We cannot survive alone. The laws of nature confirm this. No living thing can survive without  another. We all need Light + Water. Without them we could not survive.

What are your themes, and how are you expressing them visually and through dialogue?

Writers – are you suffering alone ?

127 Hours (screenplay by Danny Boyle + Simon Beaufoy) is about a man who endures the extreme depths of psychological and physical suffering but who learns through the experience, grows and changes – a heavy price to pay for character growth, especially as the story’s true.

Delve deeper and we see the movie’s major theme is connected to the protagonist’s psychological self-revelation. Before his journey into hell  Aron Ralston’s a self-proclaimed ‘big fucking hard Superhero‘ who can do everything on his own. But by the end of the movie he’s screaming for help from strangers. That’s a changed man. But what a journey it takes to get him there. His revelation and the major theme of this movie is that we need others. We cannot go it alone in this world. No man is an island.

This theme is brilliantly captured in the movie’s set-up with the eye contact between Aron and a cyclist.  Aron is on a solo adventure. The cyclist is with a bunch of others. The big question the movie asks is: should we do things alone or together?

Are you as a writer going it alone? If you’re a novelist do you use an editor? If you’re at marketing stage do you use a PR strategist? If you’re a screenwriter do you use a script consultant? Or are you, like Aron, suffering alone ?